Twitter Sues US Government Over Surveillance - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Government // Open Government
News
10/9/2014
12:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
0%
100%

Twitter Sues US Government Over Surveillance

Twitter claims the government is restricting its free speech by limiting what it can disclose about requests for customer data.

Facebook: 10 New Changes That Matter
Facebook: 10 New Changes That Matter
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

A lawsuit filed by Twitter on Wednesday highlights the continuing and somewhat surprising reticence by the federal government to let Internet companies disclose more details on the surveillance orders they receive from government for customer data.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in San Francisco, accuses the US Department of Justice, the FBI, and others of violating Twitter's First Amendment rights to free speech.

Twitter demanded that it be allowed to publish more granular details on the requests for customer data that it has received from government under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and the National Security Letter (NSL) statute.

[Seeking positive impact: Data Science That Makes a Difference.]

"The US government engages in extensive but incomplete speech about the scope of its national security surveillance activities as they pertain to US communications providers," Twitter's complaint said. At the same time, the government prohibits Internet service providers such as Twitter from providing their own informed perspective on the matter.

That "position forces Twitter either to engage in speech that has been preapproved by government officials or else to refrain from speaking altogether."

Over the past year, US technology companies have reported slowing sales in key overseas markets as a result of concerns spawned by Edward Snowden's leaks of the National Security Agency's surveillance activities.

Groups like the Cloud Security Alliance have warned that the Snowden leaks could cost American companies between $35 billion and $45 billion in lost sales over the next several years.

Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Facebook, and LinkedIn sued the government last year over the issue.

After some negotiation, both sides arrived at a settlement earlier this year under which the companies are allowed to disclose some details of US government surveillance of their networks but only in one of two pre-approved disclosure formats, Twitter said in its complaint.

One option allows the five companies to disclose aggregate data on the surveillance orders they receive but only in batches of thousands. That particular option also prohibits companies from disclosing for two years any surveillance orders they might receive involving a new technology or platform.

The second disclosure format approved by the government allows the five companies to disclose aggregate data in batches of 250.

In its lawsuit, Twitter contends that it be allowed to provide more details on the civil and criminal government requests for account information and content removal that it receives.

Twitter maintains that it cannot be held to the terms of the previous settlement agreement between the government and the five companies and claims its constitutional rights are being infringed.

The company says it wants to be able to disclose aggregate data in ranges of 25 to 100. It also wants to be able to include a descriptive statement describing the overall degree of surveillance to which it is subject.

Whatever the merits of Twitter's request, the government's reluctance to loosen the disclosure rules is surprising and suggests it may be continuing to think of the whole topic as a security-versus-privacy issue.

Twitter and all of the other companies that have sued the government have expressly said they do not wish to disclose details that might compromise government investigations or national security. Most have asked for the freedom to disclose little more than how many orders they have received under national security statutes and how many accounts those orders encompassed.

The companies have maintained that such information is important to quelling public misconceptions about the roles that Internet companies have played in the government's data-collection activities.

The government's desire not to tip its hand is understandable. But some of its disclosure restrictions are somewhat puzzling,

An entity that receives a National Security Letter demanding customer information is prohibited from disclosing the fact that it received such a letter. Similarly, the government prohibits service providers who have not received a single request for customer data to disclose that fact.

"We believe there are far less restrictive ways to permit discussion in this area while also respecting national security concerns," Twitter noted in its lawsuit.

Just when conventional wisdom had converged around the cloud being a software story, there are signs that the server market is poised for an upset, too. Get the 2014 State of Server Technology report today. (Free registration required.)

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
10/9/2014 | 6:15:03 PM
Re: Twitter Sues US Government Over Surveillance
>Why wouldn't they be able to say they got the letter? Because the admission would initiate media research into the matter?

The root of the idea is that ISPs should not notify customers suspected of crimes that they're under investigation. That's generally a worthy goal, but it can be taken too far. The US government has taken it too far by asserting that the publication of specific numbers of National Security Letters should be banned. There's no plausible rationale for disallowing the reporting of a number.
danielcawrey
50%
50%
danielcawrey,
User Rank: Ninja
10/9/2014 | 1:46:15 PM
Re: Twitter Sues US Government Over Surveillance
This is clearly making it difficult for technology companies to do business.

I get that the government has major concerns about certain products and services on the internet being used narfariously, but they need to wrap their heads around the idea that it is really hard to run a business when the government puts in place byzantine rules. 
soozyg
50%
50%
soozyg,
User Rank: Ninja
10/9/2014 | 1:05:34 PM
Re: Twitter Sues US Government Over Surveillance
@freespiritny25, I agree. As a PR/marketing consultant, people and companies use all kinds of methods to draw attention to themselves. I don't understand this part:

a National Security Letter demanding customer information is prohibited from disclosing the fact that it received such a letter. 

Why wouldn't they be able to say they got the letter? Because the admission would initiate media research into the matter?
freespiritny25
50%
50%
freespiritny25,
User Rank: Ninja
10/9/2014 | 12:17:27 PM
Re: Twitter Sues US Government Over Surveillance
I can't help but wonder if Twitter filed this lawsuit as a PR or Marketing ploy to show their customers they "care" about their security and privacy. What do you think?
Slideshows
What Digital Transformation Is (And Isn't)
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  12/4/2019
Commentary
Watch Out for New Barriers to Faster Software Development
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  12/3/2019
Commentary
If DevOps Is So Awesome, Why Is Your Initiative Failing?
Guest Commentary, Guest Commentary,  12/2/2019
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
The Cloud Gets Ready for the 20's
This IT Trend Report explores how cloud computing is being shaped for the next phase in its maturation. It will help enterprise IT decision makers and business leaders understand some of the key trends reflected emerging cloud concepts and technologies, and in enterprise cloud usage patterns. Get it today!
Slideshows
Flash Poll