Healthcare Insurance Regs Must Keep Up With Tech Advances - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Healthcare // Policy & Regulation
Commentary
10/10/2014
10:06 AM
Joshua New
Joshua New
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
50%
50%

Healthcare Insurance Regs Must Keep Up With Tech Advances

Antiquated rules could get in the way of improving people's health and lowering their healthcare costs.

Apple announced a partnership with Humana in late September to let consumers share their Apple HealthKit data with the Humana Vitality app in order to receive financial incentives for healthy behavior, such as discounts on their monthly healthcare premiums. HealthKit is a service that brings together wellness data from different wearable devices and apps, letting consumers track and share their daily steps walked, calories burned, heart rate readings, and other data.

The promise: As adoption of wearables increases and health insurers rely more heavily on biometric data, consumers and industry alike will benefit from better healthcare outcomes and lower costs.

However, this healthcare advance won't happen unless insurance regulations keep up with the technology. Under existing federal law, data from wearables and mobile devices is allowed to influence health insurance prices only if the data meets a predefined set of guidelines that constitute an employee wellness program, with a hard limit of 30% for discounts. Now that insurers have the capacity to integrate this influx of biometric data, policymakers must develop a more modern framework.

[But who owns the data? Read Prescription Database Privacy Case Heads For Legal Showdown.]

Incentivizing healthy behavior isn't new to insurance companies, and some employers already use data from wearable devices such as the Fitbit and Jawbone to offer rewards to active and healthy employees. Moreover, a recent survey of 900 US adults revealed that nearly 60% of them would be more likely to use a fitness-tracking device if it meant the possibility of lower health insurance premiums.

With the proliferation of wearable tech, and now the aggregation of the data these devices generate, insurers could have access to an unprecedented amount of high-quality data they can use to incentivize and monitor healthy behavior, thereby improving health and lowering healthcare costs. Given that 80% of US adults don't get enough exercise, the health insurance market is overdue for this type of disruption.

Beyond immediate consumer benefits, insurers and public sector agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will be able to perform unprecedented macro-level analysis and wellness monitoring as these technologies develop. Personally identifiable information could be stripped from the data to allow for a host of analysis opportunities, including real-time disease tracking to help save lives while protecting privacy. To ensure that data is representative of the entire population, policymakers should promote widespread access to wearables to help ensure that all Americans can take advantage of the related reduction of healthcare costs.

In the insurance world, a demonstrated correlation between certain characteristics and claim costs is known as actuarial justification. Certain behaviors, such as smoking, increase medical costs. Others, such as exercising frequently and eating healthily, reduce the likelihood of needing medical attention. Insurers can do their best with the demographic data they have to guess these behaviors on an approximate basis and price their plans accordingly.

But painting with such broad strokes is less likely to accurately reflect risk cost than individualized measures. In fact, auto insurers have used individual, real-time data for years to set prices more accurately -- a concept known as "usage-based insurance." Most people are familiar with Progressive Insurance's Snapshot, an in-vehicle monitoring device it offers customers that gathers and transmits real-time data about driving activities. By analyzing this data, Progressive rewards good driving behaviors with reduced prices.

Many of these same benefits are possible in health insurance. Regulators and insurers must work together to pilot a system that allows data from wearables to set prices as actuarial models deem fit, without arbitrary limits on how much prices can vary. Large pilot groups would help insurers build models of how to price insurance accurately according to an individual's behavior. Regulators could monitor that same data to prevent discriminatory or unfair price adjustments and structure regulations accordingly. It's critical that they establish a regulatory framework that lets insurers explore the full potential of this new technology and lets consumers reap the benefits.

The owners of electronic health records aren't necessarily the patients. How much control should they have? Get the new Who Owns Patient Data? issue of InformationWeek Healthcare today.

Joshua New is a policy analyst at the Center for Data Innovation. He has a background in government affairs, policy, and communication. Before joining the Center for Data Innovation, Joshua graduated from American University with degrees in C.L.E.G. (communication, legal ... View Full Bio
We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Stephane Parent
50%
50%
Stephane Parent,
User Rank: Moderator
10/29/2014 | 3:09:45 PM
Re: An easier way to do it
The trick is to switch to body fat percentage. My BMI, at 27, says I'm overweight. Yet, my body fat content is less than 15%, which is good for a man.
Gary_EL
50%
50%
Gary_EL,
User Rank: Ninja
10/29/2014 | 2:53:13 PM
Re: An easier way to do it
I'm glad you bring this up, because it frames a beef I have with the concept of BMI, or Body Mass Index. This is a way of gauging whether somebody's weight is in proportion to their height. It depends on NOTHING other than the individual's height and weight. It does not take into account the fact that some people have wide shoulders and wrists, for example. If someone has wrists that are say, 1.25 times as wide as mine, it is reasonable to expect that his arm weighs 1.25 x 1.25 times what mine does, given that we have the same proportion of body fat. This who area needs redefinition.
Stephane Parent
50%
50%
Stephane Parent,
User Rank: Moderator
10/29/2014 | 2:11:51 PM
Re: An easier way to do it
The idea of proportion between height and weight falls apart for those with bone structure or musculature outside the "normal" range. 
Gary_EL
50%
50%
Gary_EL,
User Rank: Ninja
10/10/2014 | 10:38:10 PM
An easier way to do it
Why not just give discounts to people whose weight is in proportion to their height? Then, another discount for those who don't smoke. Simple.

 
Stratustician
50%
50%
Stratustician,
User Rank: Ninja
10/10/2014 | 1:55:47 PM
Incenting for behavior
While I love the idea of rewarding good types of behaviour such as in this case, having a more active lifestyle, I feel like several baselines need to be in place for this type of solution.  For one, allowing users to review data before they subscribe to having their data permanently monitored to see if there is a benefit overall.  Much like car monitoring systems used to transmit data to insurance companies, understanding how certain behaviors really affect the adjustments in premiums need to be clearly understood.  What if a smoker otherwise had a healthy lifestyle that required little healthcare costs? Would the fact that he is a smoker override every other incentive of his healthy lifestyle?
Slideshows
IT Careers: Top 10 US Cities for Tech Jobs
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  1/14/2020
Commentary
Predictions for Cloud Computing in 2020
James Kobielus, Research Director, Futurum,  1/9/2020
News
What's Next: AI and Data Trends for 2020 and Beyond
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  12/30/2019
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
The Cloud Gets Ready for the 20's
This IT Trend Report explores how cloud computing is being shaped for the next phase in its maturation. It will help enterprise IT decision makers and business leaders understand some of the key trends reflected emerging cloud concepts and technologies, and in enterprise cloud usage patterns. Get it today!
Slideshows
Flash Poll